We ran Tusk, Cursor, and Claude Code on a benchmark PR containing a boundary condition bug and found that Tusk was the only agent that caught the edge case (in 90% of its runs).
Tusk runs its generated tests and self-iterates on its output so you can be confident that its tests are checking for relevant edge cases. Other test generation and code review tools don't do this reliably out of the box.
69% of Tusk-generated tests are incorporated into PRs. We use more compute to iterate on tests to prevent false negatives. AI-powered IDEs are optimized for latency as opposed to quality when generating tests.
Tusk automatically ingests business context from Jira/Linear as well as code patterns from your existing tests. This allows us to generate unit tests that are inline with your team’s testing best practices.
